Abstract
Safety, quality of life, and ensuring the best results for the health of patients are the main goals of healthcare institutions and the system as a whole. The modern approach to ensuring stable and reproducible quality of medical services was shaped in the last century, and has now reached a high degree of generalization. Control in this field is a multi-level process that covers all parts of the medical institution’s activities, from logistics to personnel management.
Indicators of the quality of medical services from the patient’s side range from potentially complex (postoperative morbidity and mortality) to simple (the frequency of hospital-acquired infections or surgical errors). When all of the clinic’s main business processes are clearly set up and improved as needed, this is called “process management.” This makes it possible to design quality by taking into account the indicators of meeting the requirements of technical documents.
The ISO 9000 family of standards, which is successfully used and adopted worldwide in healthcare organizations, contains requirements, specifications, instructions, and tools for the provision of products and services. They simplify comparison, information exchange, big data aggregation, and privacy protection. Regarding the patients, the standards are designed to provide high-quality, safe, and reliable products and services. There are certain precautions about an overly technological approach during quality assurance and control, but now the greatest threat is considered to be the destructive impact of war and the disruption of habitual relationships and processes.
The state of medical care, the damage to the material fund, the depletion of human resources, and the lack of financial and other resources are all concerning. Fragmentation of healthcare and unequal access in different regions and social groups are potentially threatening. Examples of countries with long-term military conflicts on their territory indicate the “erosion” of activity standards, which are usually set by external actors in such conditions in response to the limited institutional, technical, and managerial capabilities of countries in a state of conflict. Complex measures to restore the functionality of the medical care system are organized at the level of communities, individual institutions, and their associations. In this case, the first steps are the most important, since they often determine the development for years and decades ahead. Therefore, the restoration, or sometimes the “reset,” of the domestic system is an exceptional opportunity to re-prioritize, correct shortcomings, and establish stronger ties with the global professional community.
References
2. Al-Qatawneh L. Framework for establishing records control in hospitals as an ISO 9001 requirement. Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. 2017. Vol. 30, No 1. P. 37–42.
3. Berwick D., Fox D. M. “Evaluating the quality of medical care”: Donabedian’s classic article 50 years later. Milbank Q. 2016. Vol. 94, No 2. P. 237–241.
4. Buciuniene I., Malciankina S., Lydeka Z., Kazlauskaite R. Managerial attitude to the implementation of quality management systems in Lithuanian support treatment and nursing hospitals. BMC health services research. 2006. Vol. 6, No 1. P. 1–10.
5. Busse R., Panteli D., Quentin W. An introduction to healthcare quality: defining and explaining its role in health systems. Improving healthcare quality in Europe: Characteristics, effectiveness and implementation of different strategies. Copenhagen (Denmark): European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, 2019. Vol. 53. P. 1.
6. Colonna P., Pasini E., Pitocchi O., Bovenzi F., Sorino M., de Luca I. Il sistema qualità in cardiologia: un esempio pratico per sviluppare un modello organizzativo certificabile senza burocrazia [Quality system in cardiology: practical example to develop an organizational model for management certification without bureaucracy]. Ital. Heart J. Suppl. 2003. Vol. 4, No 4. P. 319–331.
7. Cometto G., Fritsche G., Sondorp E. Health sector recovery in early post-conflict environments: experience from southern Sudan. Disasters. 2010. Vol. 34. P. 885–909.
8. de Jonge V., Sint Nicolaas J., van Leerdam M. E., Kuipers E. J. Overview of the quality assurance movement in health care. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Gastroenterol. 2011. Vol. 25, No 3. P. 337–347.
9. Debarre A. Hard to Reach: Providing Healthcare in Armed Conflict. International Peace Institute, 2018. URL: www.ipinst.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/1812_Hard-to-Reach.pdf (last accessed: 18.12.2022).
10. Dombrádi V., Csenteri O. K., Sándor J., Godény S. Association between the application of ISO 9001:2008 alone or in combination with health-specific standards and quality-related activities in Hungarian hospitals. Int. J. Qual. Health Care. 2017. Vol. 29, No 2. P. 283–289.
11. Douedari Y., Howard N. Perspectives on rebuilding health system governance in opposition-controlled syria: a qualitative study. Int. J. Health Policy Manag. 2019. Vol. 8, No 4. P. 233–244.
12. Fekri O., Macarayan E. R., Klazinga N. Оценка эффективности систем здравоохранения в Европейском регионе ВОЗ: какие сферы и показатели используют государства-члены при проведении измерений? Всемирная организация здравоохранения. Европейское региональное бюро. Сводный доклад. 2018. 38 с.
13. Fulop N. J., Ramsay A. I. G. How organisations contribute to improving the quality of healthcare. BMJ. 2019. Vol. 365.
14. Galbraith R. M., Holtman M. C., Clyman S. G. Use of assessment to reinforce patient safety as a habit. Qual. Saf. Health Care. 2006. Vol. 15, Suppl. 1. P. i30–33.
15. Hakki L., Stover L., Haar R. J. Breaking the silence: Advocacy and accountability for attacks on hospitals in armed conflict. 2022. IRRC. No. 915. URL: https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/breaking-the-silence-advocacy-and-accountability-for-attacks-on-hospitals-in-armed-conflict-915 (last accessed: 18.12.2022).
16. Khanyk N., Hromovyk B., Levytska O., Agh T., Wettermark B., Kardas P. The impact of the war on maintenance of long-term therapies in Ukraine. Front. Pharmacol. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 1024046.
17. Kohn L. T., Corrigan J., Donaldson M. S. To err is human: building a safer health system. Vol. 21. Washington, D. C.: National Academy Press, 2000.
18. Leonard S., Rubenstein L. S. Post-conflict Health Reconstruction: New Foundations for U.S. Policy Working paper. U.S. Institute of Peace, 2009. P. 87
19. Lewis J. J., Rosen C. L., Grossestreuer A. V., Ullman E. A., Dubosh N. M. Diagnostic error, quality assurance, and medical malpractice/risk management education in emergency medicine residency training programs. Diagnosis (Berl). 2019. Vol. 6, No 2. P. 173–178.
20. Martineau T., McPake B., Theobald S., Raven J., Ensor T., Fustukian S., Ssengooba F., Chirwa Y., Vong S., Wurie H., Hooton N., Witter S. Leaving no one behind: lessons on rebuilding health systems in conflict- and crisis-affected states. BMJ Glob. Health. 2017. Vol. 2, No 2. P. e000327.
21. Miyagawa A., Tanigawa K. Health and medical issues in the area affected by Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2021. Vol. 19, No 1. P. 144.
22. Monitoring the building blocks of health systems: A handbook of indicators and their measurement strategies. World Health Organization. 2010. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/258734/9789241564052-eng.pdf
23. Øvretveit J. Quality evaluation and indicator comparison in health care. Int. J. Health Plann. Manage. 2001. Vol. 16, No 3. P. 229–241.
24. Papanicolas I, Smith P. Health system performance comparison: an agenda for policy, information and research: an agenda for policy, information and research. McGraw-Hill Education (UK), 2013.
25. Perides M. An Introduction to Quality Assurance in Health Care. International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 2003. Vol. 15, No 4. P. 357–358.
26. Primary health care coverage standard — UNHCR Emergency Handbook. URL: https://emergency.unhcr.org/entry/38925/primary-health-care-coverage-standard (last accessed: 18.12.2022).
27. Quality of care in fragile, conflict-affected and vulnerable settings: taking action. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020.
28. Sphere. The Sphere Handbook Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. 2018. URL: spherestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Sphere-Handbook-2018-EN.pdf (last accessed: 18.12.2022).
29. van den Heuvel J., Koning L., Bogers A. J., Berg M., van Dijen M. E. An ISO 9001 quality management system in a hospital: bureaucracy or just benefits? Int. J. Health Care Qual. Assur. Inc. Leadersh. Health Serv. 2005. Vol. 18, No 4–5. P. 361–369.